COIT20267 Computer Forensics
Assessment Specification
Presentation and Report
Due date: 23:45:00 AEST Week 6 Friday (20/04/2018) ASSESSMENT
Length: In-class Power Point presentation (15 minutes, on-campus student) with 2,000 words Report.
Recorded Video Presentation (15 minutes, D.E. students) with 2,000 words Report. 1
This assignment is designed to encourage the development of ability to apply a systematic approach in a digital investigation through the conduct of computer forensics procedures and the use of computer forensics tools, and to encourage the ability to identify the legal issues involved in a computer forensic investigation across jurisdictions. Please refer to the unit profile to see how this assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes.
General Assessment Criteria
Incomprehensible submissions. Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.
Late penalty. Late submissions will attract penalties at 5% for each calendar day or part thereof that it is late of the total available mark for the individual assessment item. This means that, for an assessment worth 35 marks, the mark that you earn is reduced by 1.75 marks each calendar day that the assessment is late (including part-days and weekends). See s4.58 in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Check with marking criteria. Before submitting your assignment, you should check it against the assessment criteria included in this specification to ensure that you have satisfactorily addressed all the criteria that will be used to mark your assignment.
Academic language. All submissions should be thoroughly proof-read for spelling, typographical or grammatical errors before being submitted. Do not rely on the ‘spell-check’ function in your word processing program. If, for example, ‘affect’ is substituted for ‘effect’, your program may not detect the error.
Academic Integrity
All assignments will be checked for plagiarism (material copied from other students and/or material copied from other sources) using TurnItIn (TII). If you are found to have plagiarised material or if you have used someone else’s words without appropriate referencing, you will be penalised for plagiarism which could result in zero marks for the whole assignment. In some circumstances a more severe penalty may be imposed. The link to the University’s Academic Misconduct Procedures is available in the unit profile.
Useful information about academic integrity (avoiding plagiarism) can be found at: CQUniversity referencing guides
Submission requirements
Who to submit? Presentation is a group assignment for on-campus students (please find detailed instructions below). One and only one of the group members needs to submit for the entire group. For Distance Education students (thereinafter “DE students”), presentation is an individual assignment and needs to be submitted individually.
What to submit? For on-campus students, both the slides in MS Power Point format (.ppt or .pptx) and the report in MS Word format (.doc or .docx) need to be submitted. No other document formats are accepted, in particular, no PDF files, Apple Pages, Apple Keynotes, Prezi links are accepted. For D.E. students, the video file type will be agreed on between the Unit Coordinator and each distance student. As for the report, it should only be in MS Word format (.doc or .docx).
No Zipped files. Students must NOT zip multiple files and must NOT compress any files (e.g. using zip, rar). Submit the individual PowerPoint and Word files only.
Example. Each D.E. student needs to submit the following as two individual files: (1) Recorded Video Presentation; (2) Report.doc(x). For on-campus students, one and only one of the group members needs to submit the following 2 individual files on behalf of the entire group: (1) Presentation Slides.ppt(x); (2) Report.doc(x).
Means of submission. All assignments must be submitted electronically to Moodle. The submission links can be accessed through the Assessment block on the Moodle unit website. Physical copies/ Email submissions are not accepted. For D.E. students, the submission of the video presentation will be agreed on between the Unit Coordinator and each distance student. As for the report, D.E. students must submit it electronically to Moodle.
Auto-submission. Moodle implements an auto-submission process for those items uploaded and left as drafts before the original deadline. However, any assessments uploaded after the original deadline must be manually submitted by the students.
Please note that auto-submission process does not work for assessments which have extensions. Auto submission only works where the original deadline of an assessment has not changed. If you are submitting after the deadline (original or extended), you must complete the Moodle submission process. Further details on completing the submission process are available via the ‘Moodle Help for Students’ link in the SUPPORT block of your Moodle pages.
Warning. Having said that, however, you should not completely rely on Moodle’s auto-submission functionality because it has not been proved to be reliable in the past. Each student should make sure they submit their assignment before the deadline by manually clicking on the submission button.
Complete and correct submission. Requests for changing files after the submission deadline may be granted if the Unit Coordinator is contacted. However, if a change of files is allowed by the Unit Coordinator, then the submission time will be taken as the latest time (i.e. when the last update is made), not the original submission time. That will result in a late penalty.
Presentation on Forensics Tools
Group/Individual assignment. This assignment is a group assignment for on-campus students and an individual assignment for D.E. students. Each group consists of 2 or 3 students. The Group formation and registration guidelines are provided in this document as well as in weeks 1 to 3.
Instructions. The aim of this assignment is to improve your industry-based practical research skills as well as to deepen your understanding of common forensic tools and how they are applicable to real-life problems. You need to research one recent ( 7 years) crime and/or misconduct that requires computer forensics, such as (but not limited to) murder, kidnap, drug trafficking, intellectual property theft, industrial espionage, employment disputes, fraud, forgeries, inappropriate email and internet use in the work place. For the purpose of this assignment, you need to:
1. Provide a detailed description of the case, i.e. what happened?
2. Report who were involved in the crime, i.e. who were the criminal(s), suspect(s) and the victim(s)?
3. Report or infer the motivation and criminal purpose, i.e. what were the sinister aims that the criminal(s) intended to achieve;
4. Identify and report what type of evidences were used in the criminal investigation of the case;
5. Report or identify, based on the face of the evidence, the type of the attack(s);
6. Identify which forensic tool(s) was/were used in this case
7. Discuss how it has affected the victim(s) and any consequences of the crime;
8. Report what the criminal punishment was, if any;
9. Report any other aspects of the case you would like to discuss, e.g. which court(s) had the jurisdiction? i.e. this case should/can be heard at which court. In your discussion, you need to
a. Critically evaluate the forensic tool(s) and discuss their capacity in various categories of functions, including acquisition, validation and verification, extraction, reconstruction and reporting;
b. Justify the selection of that/those specific tools over other tools;
c. Discuss how computer forensic experts made use of the nominated tools in the criminal investigation of the case you presented.
On-campus students are required to present their work, as a group, orally during the tutorial of Weeks 7 and 8. The presentation has a maximum of 15 minutes duration and must contain all the aforementioned aspects of the case and the forensic tool(s). The minimum slides required for the presentation is 15.
D.E. students are required to submit a recorded presentation in week 6. The presentation has a maximum of 15 minutes duration and must contain all the aforementioned aspects of the case and the forensic tool(s).
All students, on-campus as a group and D.E. students individually, need to write up a report containing all the aforementioned aspects of the case and the forensic tool(s). The report needs to be 2,000 words in length with 10% leeway on either side, excluding title page, table of contents and references list.
Specifically, your report should include the following.
1. Title page: (each) student name (in your group), (each) student number (in your group), (each) student email address (in your group, use CQU email), title of your report, local lecturer/tutor, and unit coordinator. Not counted towards the word count.
2. Executive summary: Should be approximately 300 words.
3. Table of Contents (ToC): Should list the report sub-sections in decimal notation and should be autogenerated. Not counted towards the word count.
4. Introduction: Should be approximately 300 words.
5. Body of the report: Should be approximately 1200 words. Appropriate headings in the body of the report should be used.
6. Conclusion: Should be approximately 200 words.
7. Reference list: All references must be in Harvard Referencing Style. Not counted towards the word count.
Marking Criteria
1- Presentation (10 marks)
a. Organisation: flow of presentation is appropriate; presenter is well-prepared (2 marks)
b. Format: slides contain appropriate detail; easy to read text and pictures (2 marks)
c. Content: appropriate level of detail is provided about the case (4 marks)
d. Communication skills: clear pronunciation, confident speaking; engaging presentation (2 marks)
2- Case Report (7 marks)
a. Provide detailed description of the case (2 marks)
b. Report who were involved in the crime (1 mark)
c. Motivation and criminal purpose (1 mark)
d. Type of evidences (1 mark)
e. Type of the attack (1 mark)
f. Consequences and criminal punishment (if any) (1 mark)
3- Forensic tools (13 marks)
a. Evaluation of forensic tools (5 marks)
b. Justification of selected tools (4 marks)
c. Usage of forensic tools (4 marks)
4- Quality of report (5 marks)
a. Structure of the report (1 mark)
b. Using correct expressions, grammar, spelling and punctuation (1 mark)
c. References (in-text references and the reference list) (3 marks)
– Incomprehensible English (up to 35 marks)
If the report is unable to be read and understood by the marker, the marker may impose a penalty up to 35 marks to this assessment.
– Late penalty (up to 35 marks)
In the absence of an extension, the marker will impose late penalty at 1.75 marks for each calendar day or part thereof that the assignment is overdue.
COIT20267 Computer Forensics
Group Formation, Registration and Administration Guidelines
For on-campus students, 80% of the assessments are group assignment in this unit. To ensure your success in this unit, please read and follow these guidelines regarding group formation, registration and administration.
Group size. Each group consists of 2 or 3 students. Groups of more than 3 students must be split into two or more groups. Given the amount of work students need to undertake in Assessment 2 and 3, it is highly suggested that student form a group of 3 students. Students may be added by the local tutor/lecturer to groups that consists of less than 3 students in Week 3.
Inter-tutorial groups. Students must form groups within the tutorial group that they are enrolled in. No inter-tutorial groups are allowed.
Stay in the same group. Students must stay in the same group for both the first and the second assessment.
Freedom to form groups before the deadline. Subject to the provisions in this document, students have the freedom to choose their group members before the registration deadline. After the registration deadline, however, those who are not in a group will be allocated to a group by the local tutor/lecturer.
Group Charter. A sample Group Charter has been attached to this document in Schedule 1. The Group Charter is an instrument to help establish team roles, cohesion and on time delivery while minimising potential conflicts. Members should agree on the elements and establish ground rules at the time of the formation of your group.
Deadline. The deadline for group registration is 11:45pm AEST Friday Week 3.
Penalty for not registering before the deadline. Students who have not registered before the deadline receive no penalty on their marks; they will, however, lose the freedom to form a group on their own. Local lecturers/tutors will assign them into a group.
Means of registration. To register your group, students must send their local tutor an email with “[COIT20267] Group Registration” in the subject line. In the body of that email, students must list out the name and their student ID for each member in their group. The registration email must arrive at their tutor’s inbox before the registration deadline to be constituted as a valid registration.
Conflicts. The Group Charter will help you to establish rules and procedures to resolve conflicts within your group. If there is anything that you think you will need to involve your tutor/lecturer, please do not hesitate to do so.
Burden to prove. If you make any allegation against any other group members, you bear the evidential onus to prove your allegation.
Group marks. Everyone in the same group will receive the same mark unless:
(1) there is any issue brought to the attention of the tutor and
(2) the tutor finds it is fundamentally unfair to give every group member the same mark.
Students may be removed from a group. In some circumstances, students may be removed from their group due to their significant lack of contribution. Once it happens, students being removed from a group will need to undertake all assessment individually from the time they are removed. The marking standard and criteria will remain the same.
Schedule 1. A sample Group Charter
This is a sample Group Charter; to register your group, please use the “Group Formation Registration Form” which is available in weeks 1 to 3 materials.
Group Details
Aiming marks: HD/D/C/P/F Group
established date/week:
Group leader:
Group member details:
Student Name Student ID Contact Details Comments
Communication Plan/Requirement
Communication method: CQU Email / Text Message / Phone Call / Whatsapp / Facebook / WeChat / Others:
Group communication frequency and relevant details:
Deemed Receipt Time. The deemed receipt time is the time that the message is able to be retrieved from the server, that is, in case of email, it is the time when the email arrives at your inbox; in case of text message, it is the time you receive that message.
Expected Response Time. All group members must reply emails within 48 hours of the deemed receipt time; and must reply text messages within 24 hours of the deemed receipt time.
If any group member does not reply to emails/phone calls/text messages, we will take the following steps to resolve this matter:
Meeting Plan/Requirements Meeting Methods/locations:
Meeting Frequency and length:
Excuses. The following are not recognised as valid excuses in this group to be absent from a scheduled group meeting.
1. I live very far from the city and it is very inconvenient for me to travel to the University.
2. I have got part time job, and cannot make it to the group meeting.
3. …
4. …
Group Member Responsibilities
1. How will the members ensure overall fairness and respect within the group?
2. How will the group ensure fairness and equity in assessment task allocation?
3. What if a member does not agree with the task allocation or other group decisions?
4. How will the group ensure on time delivery of tasks by the group members?
5. What is the process to ensure quality control of tasks?
6. What will the group do if one or more members do not meet deadlines and/or continues to provide less effort on a regular basis (e.g. lateness to meetings, not enough attention, missing task deadlines)?
7. What are the penalties for non-compliance with requirements as in point 7 above?
8. How will the group consider one-off individual emergency situations?
9. What is the mechanism to resolve issues within the group?
10. What is the mechanism to escalate issues if they cannot be resolved within the group?
11. What will the members do if they don’t agree with the group leadership?
Agreement Details
Student name Signature Date
Looking for answers ?
Chat with us at get the answers

Recent Questions
HI6008 Assignment 1 Requirements StructureAll HI6008 Students Enrol in the Semester 1/2018 need to follow below Assignment structure:1. Introduction2. Project Objective3. Project Scope4. Literature Review…ITC 508 Object ModellingAssessment item 2Elaboration phaseValue: 35%Due date: 27-Apr-2018Return date: 18-May-2018Length: Word length 1800 to 2000Submission method optionsAlternative submission methodTaskIn…Assessment 2: Due date Friday, 18 May 2018, 2:20 PMFor this assessment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation in which you discuss the selection of an ERP and vendor for your organisation (Reliable…Assesment 1: Due date Friday, 27 April 2018, 2:20 PMWord length: 2000 – 2500 wordsCase Study: Reliable Training Centre (RTC)The Reliable Training Centre (RTC) started 20 years ago with 10 staff members….Assessment 3: Due date: Week 11 Friday (25 May 2018) 11:45 pm AESTWord length: 3000 – 3500 words (Excluding Executive summary, Introduction, Conclusion & References)Your TaskFor this assessment, it…COIT 20268 – Responsive Web Design (RWD)(Term 1 – 2018)- Portfolio 1- Practical Assessment 1BackgroundHouse of Cards, is a sole-proprietor with a proper shop front (i.e. an actual physical building where…The instructions are listed in the Attachments. SPRING 2018 MGMT4308 CASE STUDY PROJECT TWO INSTRUCTIONS Brooke Garcia, MBA Case Subject: Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment

Published by
View all posts